
If a home inspector found “wide and unpredictable variation” in your smoke detectors, would you want to fix them?
For any policymaker serious about the issues of access and affordability, a new analysis issued by Avalere should raise the same issue regarding the budget impact threshold used by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). While this issue sounds arcane, it holds real implications for stakeholders, particularly patients. If ICER gets its thresholds wrong, it could have serious, negative implications for patient access to important new treatments.
Avalere found that “wide and arbitrary variation in ICER’s budget threshold may limit its reliability as a benchmark.” In particular, Avalere found that the budget impact threshold calculated by ICER ($904 million from 2015 to 2016) can change dramatically based on the year a new medicine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That’s because one of the variables ICER uses to calculate the budget impact threshold is annual FDA drug approvals, which varies considerably from year to year.

For example:
- In years with fewer FDA approvals, 94 percent to 100 percent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer could be treated with new medicines without triggering a budget impact affordability alert. But during years of high approvals, fewer than 40 percent of patients in need could receive these drugs before crossing ICER’s threshold.
- Slightly less than half of patients with plaque psoriasis would have access to new treatments in the best-case scenario. In years of high approvals, the percentage of patients who could be treated before triggering an affordability alert would be just 26 percent and 29 percent, respectively.

Patients deserve better than access restrictions based on false alarms. That’s why our industry frequently provides payers data on the estimated budget impact of new treatments and why our sector is making unprecedented investments in better tools for value assessment.
View the Avalere study here.
Randy Burkholder
Randy Burkholder is a Vice President of Policy and Research at PhRMA. He has over 17 years experience in health care policy, advocacy and communications in the medical technology and pharmaceutical industries.
Health care practitioners sound the alarm on middlemen-imposed barriers to patient care, need for policy change
Three things to know about the United Nations’ new HIV/AIDS report
Case study: How seniors could face access disruptions because of the IRA’s price setting provisions
ICYMI: Misaligned policies undermine patient access
3 Takeaways from POLITICO’s Health Care Summit
New analysis of patient access restrictions in the United Kingdom
ICYMI: 3 takeaways on the IRA’s unintended consequences from America’s Physician Groups’ 2023 annual fall conference
Incomplete evaluations undermine patient access to transformational medicine
Navigating the Patient Experience Survey: Protecting Lifelines to Access and Innovation
States can support access to medicine as COVID-19 Public Health Emergency ends
Minnesota lawmakers are letting PBMs off the hook, and threatening patients’ access to medicines
In their own words: Insured Americans support policy reforms that address access and affordability concerns
CMS coverage decision restricts access to treatments for Alzheimer’s disease
You won’t fix what you don’t value: Two reasons why traditional cost-effective analyses can perpetuate health inequities
PhRMA presents research at ISPOR 2022
Report finds PBMs are increasingly restricting patient access to medicines
Innovative contracts continue to gain traction and improve quality of care
Study finds nearly half of payers believe innovative contracts can lead to lower patient out-of-pocket costs
Getting the 340B program back on track in 2021
Growth in innovative, value-based contracts holds promise for the health system and for patients
Innovative contracts drive access for patients and value for the system
ICYMI: Patients saved nearly $800,000 out of pocket through innovative contracting arrangements
PhRMA comments on HHS proposed rule on manufacturer cost-sharing assistance and accumulator adjustment programs
Low-value health care costs $345B each year and provides little benefit
Addressing barriers that inhibit value-based contracts
Guest post: Value-based agreements can improve outcomes and even save patients money at the pharmacy counter
New data show how ICER’s value framework could prevent or delay access to treatments for Medicaid patients across the country
Guest Post: Following my stroke, having access to ground-breaking medical innovation has never been more important
Setting the record straight on international reference pricing
5 Ways to improve ICER’s value assessment framework
Assessing value top of mind at ISPOR 2019
Fact Check: How the Part B International Pricing Index model threatens patient access
New analysis shows 820,000 prescriptions would be in jeopardy if ICER’s value framework is used in Medicaid
Value assessments should include all the outcomes that matter to patients and families
PhRMA comments to administration on Medicare Part D proposed rule
ICYMI: New study reinforces dangers of proposed IPI model
Groups sound the alarm on administration’s new Part B proposal
4 things you need to know about the administration’s latest Part B proposal
PhRMA submission to the 2019 National Trade Estimate Report urges action to protect U.S. biopharmaceutical innovation
Event tomorrow: Leaders convene to discuss solutions to advance value-driven health care
New whitepaper identifies reasons why ICER’s cost-effectiveness analyses are not useful for payers
Guest post: Developing new payment models to ensure patients have access to high-investment therapies
Number of value-based contracts continues to rise
How much do you know about Medicare Part B?
PhRMA submission to HHS on blueprint to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs
Event next week: Supporting the next generation of lifesaving medicines
How ICER’s assessment of a new class of migraine treatments fails patients
Guest post: Excellent care for LGBTQ patients requires cultural humility and specific medical knowledge
Aspen Spotlight Health: Discussing the forefront of innovation
New analysis shows that more medicines worldwide are available to U.S. patients
New analysis shows that HTA organizations may frequently restrict access to cancer treatments
New analysis shows negative impact of ICER’s value framework on patient access in Medicare Part B
ICYMI: Recent survey adds to growing body of research on barriers to innovative payment approaches
Event tomorrow: Improving patient access to lifesaving medicines
Event tomorrow: Making the biopharmaceutical supply chain work for patients
Reality check: Value-based contracts are good for patients
Video: Barriers to results-based contracts
PPA celebrates 13 years of helping patients access their medicines
Improving care quality by engaging patients in shared decision making
ICYMI: Research shows promise of innovative payment arrangements in reducing costs, improving access
Copay coupons can help ease patients’ out-of-pocket costs
PhRMA launches new consumer-facing Let’s Talk About Cost website
Clarity around anti-kickback statute needed to promote innovative payment arrangements
Video: What is a results-based contract?
How much are hospitals marking up the price of medicines? The answer may surprise you.
PhRMA Foundation recognizes inaugural Challenge Award recipients
Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Walgreens and other CEOs discuss value in the future of health care
The journey to better health care requires a holistic view
Medicare Monday: How Part B has evolved over the years
Modernizing FDA regulations to advance a value-driven health care system
Foreign government price setting by any name harms innovation and access to medicines
PhRMA CEO in Forbes - How to negotiate better deals for prescription medicines
ICYMI: Avalere and FasterCures develop new value framework from patient perspective
Compulsory licensing: A misused and abused international trade law
Government-imposed price controls threaten innovation and access
ICYMI: Innovative payment models helping provide patient access to new medicines
RA medicines often demonstrate far greater benefits to patients than initially understood
New analysis: More than half of patients’ out-of-pocket spending for brand medicines is based on full list price
Stakeholders Agree: Modernize the legal framework to support move to value-driven health care
How do multiple sclerosis patients define value?
Biopharmaceutical industry’s success reducing disparities for African Americans
Medicare Monday: What is IPAB, and why is it bad for patients?
PhRMA CEO talks White House meeting, innovation & jobs with POLITICO’s Pulse Check
VIDEO: PhRMA CEO discusses #GOBOLDLY campaign and White House meeting with CNNMoney’s Maggie Lake
The Value Collaborative: Advancing private market solutions to achieve better health, lower costs
ICER’s budget impact threshold: Sounding a false alarm on affordability and access
Access
Value-Driven Health Care
The Value Collaborative
ICER’s budget impact threshold: Sounding a false alarm on affordability and access
ICER’s budget impact threshold: Sounding a false alarm on affordability and access