![True_False_Jan2018_v3[3].gif](https://cdn.aglty.io/phrma/global/blog/import/images/True_False_Jan2018_v33.gif)
The 340B program was designed to increase access to medicines for vulnerable or uninsured patients through safety-net facilities, but all signs point to 340B doing the opposite – distorting the market and increasing health care costs for everyone while at the same time generating record levels of profit for hospitals. Claiming that 340B operates at no cost for Americans seems a bit disingenuous.
This week on Fact Check Friday, we are setting the record straight. Here are three ways 340B is currently leading to higher health care costs for Americans:
1. The 340B program incentivizes hospitals to drive up treatment costs to increase their profits
Current rules enable participating hospitals to make a profit by dispensing 340B medicines that were obtained at a discounted rate, requesting reimbursement at the non-discounted rate and then pocketing the difference between the two rates. This means there is an opportunity for 340B hospitals to obtain higher profit margins when they administer more expensive drugs, and independent economists have called attention to the fact that 340B may lead prescribing at participating hospitals to “shift toward more expensive drugs because profit margins will in general be larger.”
2. The 340B program is driving the shift of treatment to more expensive sites of care
A major trend among 340B hospitals is purchasing or acquiring community-based physician practices. Hospitals can then expand the reach of the 340B program and bring in more profit by registering these entities as their offsite outpatient sites. Patients with commercial insurance often are forced to pay more for medicines provided at hospitals or these hospital-owned physician practices than at a community physician office, and a recent analysis confirmed that 340B is driving patients to more expensive hospitals settings for physician-administered medicines. Furthermore, a white paper by the University of Minnesota notes that 340B “will ultimately end up increasing health care costs for everyone” as a result of this shift in site of care.
3. The 340B program’s year-over-year growth is contributing to higher prescription drug prices
A 2016 analysis published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that the scope of 340B is so broad for commonly infused or injected drugs that it’s likely raising prices for all consumers. With no requirement to pass discounts onto patients, 340B hospitals may be increasing out-of-pocket costs for patients who are left to pay the regular price for their medicine despite the discounted price the hospital received.
And in case you missed it: On top of all of this evidence of 340B driving increased patient costs, a brand new study published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine and funded by a grant from a division of the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that “Financial gains for [340B] hospitals have not been associated with clear evidence of expanded care or lower mortality among low-income patients.”
Enough is enough. Congress should pass the 340B PAUSE Act and the HELP ACT so 340B can get back on track. For more information about the 340B program, visit PhRMA.org/340B.
Nicole Longo
Nicole Longo is Deputy Vice President of public affairs at PhRMA focusing on Medicare, 340B, importation and more. She previously worked for a D.C.-based public affairs firm where she assisted a wide range of clients with communications efforts on everything from trade policy to agriculture policy to health care policy. Outside the office, Nicole can be found trying new restaurants (usually Italian), taking an occasional barre class and cheering on the Cincinnati Bengals.
Nicole Longo
Why 340B needs an itemized bill
Employers faced $12.8 billion in higher costs due to 340B in 2025
New Report: Hospitals, clinics and for-profit partners pocketed $142B in 2025 from 340B
Hospitals are hiding information that could lower costs for patients
As football season kicks off, hospitals keep scoring on 340B
ICYMI: Hospital consolidation is driving up health care costs
It's time to modernize 340B: The case for a rebate model
ICYMI: Fox business hosts call 340B a ‘Rotten System’ and ‘Cash Cow’ for hospitals
340B’s reality: A booming business for hospitals, pharmacies and corporate giants
340B’s lack of guardrails lets big hospital systems turn it into an oversight-free revenue stream
Private equity's new play? Become a nonprofit to profit off 340B.
340B is growing, but it is unclear if Illinois patients benefit
Fox Business spotlights hospitals abuse of the 340B program
The Wall Street Journal raises new alarms about 340B
Hospitals in the hot seat: Congress sharpens focus on 340B, consolidation and rising costs
New "Goldmine” ad reveals hospitals hide how they profit from 340B markups
A program off track: How 340B drives both hospital consolidation and system gaming
Washington Post Editorial Board says 340B has become “corporate welfare”
Modernizing 340B using rapid verification: The case for a rebate model
CMS’ MFN proposals won’t help seniors despite lofty promises
Voters voice concerns on government price controls
Congress should look under the hood of 340B, hospitals don't want them to
340B hospitals buy low and sell high, a new analysis shows
New report from Minnesota: 340B is generating billions for big hospitals
340B hospital markup scheme is costing states, taxpayers billions
Questions mount over 340B program and increased cost to everyone
PhRMA Forum 2026 highlights the importance of fostering the next era of American leadership
50-state poll says Americans are concerned that hospital markups hurt patients
New analysis finds 340B hospitals push patients toward costly care to boost profits
Data shows tax-exempt hospital profit-seeking behavior, not drug prices, is driving explosive 340B expansion
Big, tax-exempt hospitals are charging cancer patients, employers massive medicine markups
340B’s billion-dollar boom: Oversight lags as spending soars
New study: 340B rebate model pilot won’t hurt cash flow for providers
One thing the Senate can agree on: It’s time to fix 340B
Middlemen mark up drug prices and keep discounts meant for you
The Administration approves manufacturers’ 340B rebate pilot plans
340B abuses are fueling higher Medicare costs, new BRG report shows
ICYMI: The Wall Street Journal calls 340B reform a “good idea to cut drug costs”
340B hospitals use scare tactics to evade accountability
Why states struggle to deliver savings: Middlemen and 340B siphon dollars from patients and states
CBO: 340B program costs taxpayers, no evidence patients benefit
PhRMA stresses importance of 340B Rebate Model Pilot
New “Meet Mark” ad exposes how the 340B hospital markup program drives up costs for everyone
New study unmasks how big-city hospitals exploit 340B by posing as rural providers
Study: 340B hospitals drive up patient drug costs
Curbing 340B abuse and rising costs with the rebate model
The hidden cost of 340B: A multi-billion-dollar burden on taxpayers and Medicaid
Latest analysis from Ohio exposes growing abuses of the 340B markup program
New report finds rampant abuse of the 340B program
How the 340B hospital markup program could hurt Michigan patients
New “Balance the Scales” campaign highlights why Americans pay more for prescription medicines
How the 340B hospital markup program and PBMs drive up costs for U.S. patients
Foreign first pricing schemes don’t address why Americans pay more
When hospitals have free rein to mark up drug prices, who pays the price?
New report finds more abuse of 340B program by hospitals and drug middlemen
A closer look at how health care consolidation drives up patient costs, creates barriers to care
340B markup program is a hidden tax, increasing costs for employers, straining state and federal budgets
New report sheds light on payment flows in the pharmaceutical supply chain, including the role of 340B and vertical integration
Wrapping up the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference
NYT exposes hospitals, middlemen make millions off a hospital markup program
PhRMA CEOs Tee Up Next Week's Health Care Conference
New study: Entities that don’t make medicines get half of what is spent on those medicines
A new administration poses new opportunities for patient access
New 340B report from Minnesota exposes steep hospital markups on medicines, patient benefits remain unclear
Michigan hospitals using federal program to markup cost of medicines, gouging patients
340B spending is exploding, forcing prices up for patients, employers and government programs
Three things to know about 340B contract pharmacies
PhRMA urges HRSA not to impede new 340B pricing approaches to improve transparency and integrity
Illegal abuse of 340B hurts us all
340B sales go up, free or reduced-cost care offered at hospitals goes down
ICYMI: Health care policy should be driven by patients, not politics
The hidden bill patients don’t know they are paying
340B grows and grows, but patients do not see the savings
340B grows and grows, but patients do not see the savings
PBMs using 340B program to drive profits at patients’ expense
What’s the 340B program like in your state?
New year, same exploitation of the 340B program
How the 340B program became a PBM giveaway
New report adds to questions about nonprofit status of 340B hospitals
By the Numbers: 340B continues to climb in profits, dwindle with patient support
New 340B Mega Guidance
New report: Hospitals mark up medicine prices 500%
read more
PhRMA responds to Senate: Today’s 340B program leaves patients behind | PhRMA
Navigating the Patient Experience Survey: Protecting Lifelines to Access and Innovation
New studies add to body of evidence questioning 340B efficacy
340B program reaches $100 billion in sales, while patients are left behind
Nonprofit hospitals fall short on community benefit, studies show
Why Congress should prioritize fixing the 340B program
What they are saying: Nonprofit hospitals are gaming the system at the expense of patients
Recognizing National Glaucoma Awareness Month
ICYMI: PhRMA kicks off the year at the 2023 J.P. Morgan Health Care Conference
340B program continues to drive shift in care to more expensive hospital settings
In their own words: Insured Americans support policy reforms that address access and affordability concerns
The 340B program is interfering with the U.S. biosimilars market and impacting patient costs
Three ways 340B is failing vulnerable patients
If patients aren’t benefiting from the 340B program, who is?
New data: The 340B program is driving up costs for patients and our health care system
Navigating the patient experience: Burdens and barriers standing between patients and their care
Word of the Month: 340B covered entity
This week’s reading list: All the reasons the Senate-passed drug pricing bill is bad policy
Myth vs. Fact: The Senate’s latest price setting proposal
ICYMI: Patients across the country are sharing concerns about government price setting
New analysis finds deeper impact of drug pricing bill on biopharmaceutical researchers
ICYMI: A patient, physician, biotech investor and industry leaders warn about the dangers of government price setting bill
The Patient Perspective: Government price-setting harms patients
340B program remains second largest federal drug program, yet little solid evidence of benefits to patient
Study after study after study: Contract pharmacy expansion not aligned in communities 340B is meant to serve
New research finds gaps in charity care provided by 340B hospitals
Spotlighting a growing mental health challenge
By the numbers: Contract pharmacy participation in the 340B program
340B 101: Three charts show the program maximizes hospitals’ bottom line with little consideration for patients
New study finds more than half of brand medicine spending goes to the supply chain and others
Making medicines more affordable: Preserving safety-net programs like 340B
Insurance design barriers can impact patient adherence and can lead to poor health outcomes
Fact Check: Do contract pharmacies help patients access 340B medicines? No.
New video: Why changes to the 340B program are essential for patients
New analysis adds to research questioning whether 340B is working as Congress intended
340B hospitals among those that provide lowest levels of community benefit across the country
Getting the 340B program back on track in 2021
Correcting the record: Biopharmaceutical companies remain committed to the 340B program and helping patients
PhRMA submits comments on ways to refocus the 340B program on America’s vulnerable patients
340B hospitals and for-profit pharmacies generating significant revenue from program meant to help needy patients
Growth in 340B program has not translated to improvements for patients
New GAO report: Some hospitals participating in 340B may not be eligible for the program
Nearly 50% of brand medicine spending goes to the supply chain and others
Guest Post: Following my stroke, having access to ground-breaking medical innovation has never been more important
340B Spotlight: How for-profit middlemen are taking advantage of a program meant to support nonprofit entities and patients
Study finds hospitals continue to mark up medicines up to 500% of their cost
Fresh data show, yet again, 340B is growing while charity care dwindles at many 340B hospitals
New study finds hospitals continue to push patients to costlier outpatient settings
340B continues to drive shift in site of care for physician-administered medicines to more expensive hospital settings
PhRMA comments to administration on Medicare Part D proposed rule
Keep the Six Protected Classes, protected
New study finds hospitals prescribe more medicines, and more expensive medicines, after joining 340B program
What if a couple of small fixes could protect seniors in the donut hole and save them money on out-of-pocket costs?
New study finds some hospitals mark up medicine prices at least 700 percent
New analysis finds 340B medicine sales hit record high in 2017 and continue to grow as a share of total drug spending
How much do you know about Medicare Part B?
PhRMA submission to HHS on blueprint to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs
GAO again recommends improvements to 340B program
How ICER’s assessment of a new class of migraine treatments fails patients
ICYMI: Analysis finds higher outpatient drug spending at 340B hospitals
New 340B analysis: Hospitals raking in billions while uncompensated care drops by billions
New report shows over 500 medicines in development for neurological disorders
340B Spotlight: How much money are hospitals pocketing under 340B and what are they doing with those profits?
340B Spotlight: Hospital system adds voice to comments about flawed 340B program
340B Spotlight: New pieces of legislation continue momentum to fix 340B program
340B Spotlight: ICYMI – 340B hearing, new reports highlight growing need for program reform
How much are hospitals marking up the price of medicines? The answer may surprise you.
VIDEO: PhRMA CEO discusses industry response to opioid crisis on Mornings with Maria
340B Spotlight: New analysis finds 340B program growth continues to accelerate despite false claims
340B Spotlight: ICYMI – AJC looks at how some Georgia hospitals are profiting off 340B
340B Spotlight: 340B hospitals continue to benefit from consolidation at expense of patients
Medicare Monday: A discussion on affordability and access to medicines
17 years (and more) of medical discoveries
How do multiple sclerosis patients define value?
ICYMI: New era of medicine initiative kicks off in Boston
Biopharmaceutical industry’s success reducing disparities for African Americans
340B Spotlight: Audit findings show importance of increased oversight of 340B program
Fact Check Friday: The truth about the cost of 340B to patients
Patients
340B
340B Spotlight
Fact Check Friday: The truth about the cost of 340B to patients
Fact Check Friday: The truth about the cost of 340B to patients