phrma logo

PhRMA

PhRMA Sites

Login

Explore Member-Only Resources

Access exclusive advocacy, policy, and research materials through the member site.

Login now

About

About

Our Agenda

Our Agenda

Policy Issues

We believe that patients should have access to innovative medicines.

Learn More

Innovation Ecosystem

Intellectual Property

Research & Development

Future of Medicine

Government Price Setting

International

Innovation Ecosystem

Patient Access & Affordability

PBMs & Middlemen

Hospitals and 340B

Insurance Coverage

Cost of Medicines

Medicare & Medicaid

Patient Access & Affordability

Resources

Our mission is to conduct effective advocacy for public policies that encourage the discovery of important, new medicines for patients by biopharmaceutical research companies.

Learn More

Resources

Resources

Newsroom

Newsroom

Blog

Blog

America's Medicines

PhRMA Foundation

PhRMA Foundation Logo

Voters for Cures

VotersForCures.org Logo

Working for Cures

workersforcures.org logo

This is Innovation

Innovation.org logo

View More

Search in PhRMA

Find resources, news, and articles related to policy issues and scientific innovation.

What are you looking for?

Most Recent

Policy Paper

Press

Blog

Report

Fact Sheet

Event

Resource

Pages

Leader

Author

Comment

not used title

not used title

If you or a loved one were to receive a diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening disease, you would likely want access to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved safe and effective medicine as soon as possible. That’s precisely why the accelerated approval pathway was created back in 1992 at the urging of patient advocates. Since then, it has been a lifeline for millions of patients. Primarily utilized for cancers, rare diseases and HIV/AIDS, the pathway allows patients earlier access to potentially lifesaving medicines – often when no other treatment is available and when patients are facing difficult odds.

Here are three key things to know about this patient need-focused pathway and its impact over the last 30 years:

The accelerated approval pathway was developed by the FDA in 1992 as a response to the growing HIV/AIDS epidemic and calls by patient advocates for the agency to expedite access to promising medicines in development.

  • Developing an innovative medicine is a lengthy and complex process that takes an average of 10 to 15 years. But patients fighting serious or life-threatening diseases – including hard-to-treat cancers – often don’t have time on their side. Amid the growing HIV/AIDS epidemic in the early 1990s and in response to the urging of patient advocates, the FDA designed the accelerated approval pathway to allow patients earlier access to potentially lifesaving treatments — an action that, no doubt, saved lives then and has been improving and extending lives for the last 30 years. For example, accelerated approval awarded to two therapies for non-small cell lung cancer allowed more than 500,000 patients to get those treatments sooner, allowing the combined patient population to live nearly 200,000 additional years compared with expected survival had the medicines not been available.

Medicines granted accelerated approval must adhere to the same standards for establishing safety and effectiveness as medicines receiving a traditional FDA approval.

  • Medicines granted accelerated approval must provide substantial evidence of effectiveness per the FDA based on “adequate and well controlled clinical investigations.” The pathway specifically allows FDA to approve drugs based on a determination that the product has an effect on certain surrogate endpoints or intermediate clinical endpoints. Surrogate or intermediate endpoint can be based on a laboratory measurement (like blood glucose level for diabetes), radiographic image (like tumor size reduction), physical sign (like blood pressure for cardiovascular disease) or other measure. For instance, reduction of viral load in HIV patients, reduced tumor size in cancer patients or alleviation of symptoms can all be used to show a treatment’s benefit to patients. Congress has clarified, through statute, that the accelerated approval pathway does not alter the standards of evidence required for approval.

After a medicine is granted accelerated approval, companies are required to conduct, and provide updates on, confirmatory trials and the FDA is required to make this information publicly available.

  • Companies are required to conduct confirmatory studies of medicines granted accelerated approval and are subject to reporting requirements on the status of these studies. The FDA is required to track, and make publicly available, progress of confirmatory trials.

  • It is important to understand the challenges of conducting confirmatory trials. There are a number of reasons that a confirmatory trial may take longer than originally planned, including the inability to enroll patients as quickly as anticipated, for example due to patients enrolling in other studies aimed at the same population, patients being less willing to volunteer for studies of FDA-approved medicines or small patient populations.

The accelerated approval pathway has demonstrated considerable success for patients facing serious or life-threatening diseases and provided earlier access to treatments for illnesses with unmet medical needs. As policymakers examine the pathway, it is vital any changes do not hinder the significant benefits stemming from the program expediting patient access to lifesaving medicines.

To learn more about the importance of the accelerated approval pathway, click here.

Lucy Vereshchagina, PhD

Dr. Lucy Vereshchagina is executive vice president of science and regulatory advocacy at PhRMA. In this role, Dr. Vereshchagina leads PhRMA’s science and regulatory advocacy department supporting PhRMA’s policy, advocacy and science priorities, as well as global regulatory advocacy efforts, including the International Council for Harmonization (ICH). Dr. Vereshchagina was the lead PhRMA negotiator for both PDUFA VII and BsUFA III and testified before Congress on the agreements’ reauthorization.

Prior to joining PhRMA in 2012, Dr. Vereshchagina spent over 12 years with the FDA & Healthcare Practice at an international law firm and the Investigational Drug Branch at the National Cancer Institute. She has a master’s degree in Biochemistry and Chemistry, earned her Ph.D. in Chemistry at the Catholic University of America, and completed her post-doctoral studies in molecular biology and immunology at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

Lucy Vereshchagina

https://www.linkedin.com/in/lucy-vereshchagina-phd-416b27a/

Executive Vice President of Science and Regulatory Advocacy

Mass compounding puts patients at risk

July 16, 2026

Advancing patient care: A look at new medicines approved in 2025

January 30, 2026

Knockoffs of FDA-approved drugs put patients at risk

December 1, 2025

PDUFA: Essential to America’s edge in drug development and patient access

October 31, 2025

Major drug compounder is spending millions on misleading Super Bowl ad

February 5, 2025

More oversight needed of unapproved medicines that threaten patients’ health

August 1, 2024

The use of real-world data in drug development

May 13, 2024

New analysis: Accelerated approval pathway is changing lives in underserved communities

April 30, 2024

Novel treatments and vaccines approved for U.S. patients in 2023 reach five-year high

January 23, 2024

Florida’s importation plan puts patients in danger

January 5, 2024

The Biopharmaceutical Industry Still Needs Clarity from the FDA on Orange Book Listings

December 19, 2023

Decentralized clinical trials and the future of drug development

August 9, 2023

How FDA’s modernization strategy could improve drug development

June 20, 2023

Setting the record straight on accelerated approval

May 22, 2023

A guide to MedPAC’s Part B vote today

April 13, 2023

FDA should remain the authority on the safety and effectiveness of medicines

April 12, 2023

MedPAC proposal threatens access to medicines in Part B

April 6, 2023

Novel medicines approved in 2022 offer increased treatment options for patients

January 23, 2023

What you should know about real-world evidence and drug development

December 19, 2022

PDUFA and BsUFA reauthorizations are wins for patients

October 5, 2022

Word of the Month: Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints

July 11, 2022

Why drug importation is bad for Americans

May 12, 2022

Ensuring timely reauthorization of PDUFA and BsUFA

May 11, 2022

The accelerated approval pathway: Helping patients with serious or life-threatening diseases

March 17, 2022

The importance of timely PDUFA and BsUFA reauthorization

February 3, 2022

ICYMI: New approvals by the FDA in 2021 offer greater treatment options for patients

January 26, 2022

Biosimilar User Fee Act (III) Performance Goals Letter will help increase options for patients and promote competition

September 28, 2021

Meeting Tomorrow: Looking ahead to PDUFA VII

September 27, 2021

The impact of monoclonal antibodies and COVID-19 recovery

September 2, 2021

PDUFA VII is critical for future biopharmaceutical innovation and for patients

August 23, 2021

How strengthening the biosimilar marketplace benefits patients

May 18, 2021

The FDA Office of Minority Health and Health Equity: Working to advance health equity through diversity in research

May 12, 2021

2020 FDA approvals show innovation despite COVID-19 pandemic challenges

January 26, 2021

Nearly 400 cell and gene therapies in development to target a broad range of diseases

March 10, 2020

PhRMA submits comments on FDA’s proposed rule on drug importation

March 10, 2020

Drug importation: An old idea that is still a bad idea

January 28, 2020

ICYMI: 2019 brings innovative medicines to patients

January 17, 2020

PhRMA comments to Congress on Cures 2.0 call to action

December 18, 2019

What they’re saying: Safety is top concern for recent drug importation proposal

August 8, 2019

ICYMI: Canadian government, stakeholders voice concerns with drug importation proposals

August 1, 2019

PhRMA responds to Florida’s request for information on drug importation

June 26, 2019

Guest Post: Using the patient voice to go boldly

May 30, 2019

IP Explained: How Hatch-Waxman successfully balances affordability and innovation

May 22, 2019

PhRMA CEO raises concerns with Florida importation proposal, highlights reforms needed to lower costs for patients

May 8, 2019

Guest post: Hearing from patients on Rare Disease Day

February 28, 2019

Rare Disease Day: Unmet medical need inspires biopharmaceutical innovation

February 28, 2019

Look at the facts. Drug importation is dangerous.

February 22, 2019

Why state drug importation pilot programs don’t work

February 8, 2019

Putting 2018 medicine approvals in context

January 23, 2019

FDA needs best and brightest to advance a new era of medicine with America’s biopharmaceutical companies

October 16, 2018

Balancing innovation and competition in the biologics marketplace

October 11, 2018

New analysis shows that more medicines worldwide are available to U.S. patients

June 5, 2018

Securely dispose of your unwanted medicines on National Take Back Day

April 28, 2018

Spending on medicines grew less than one percent in 2017

April 19, 2018

Rare Disease Day: Unmet need inspires innovation

February 28, 2018

Innovation comes in many forms, including new and expanded uses of existing medicines

January 29, 2018

ICYMI: Why 2017 medicine approvals matter

January 12, 2018

New surveys find payers and providers want more data from biopharmaceutical companies

December 6, 2017

Supporting opportunities for enhanced competition in the marketplace

November 22, 2017

The Washington Post retracts PhRMA claim in opioid story

October 18, 2017

PhRMA response to Washington Post and 60 Minutes stories

October 16, 2017

VIDEO: PhRMA CEO discusses industry response to opioid crisis on Mornings with Maria

October 12, 2017

Protect your health: Important disaster preparedness tips for Harvey and Irma

September 6, 2017

PhRMA Supports President’s Commission’s Holistic Approach on Opioid Crisis

August 2, 2017

Opportunities to build upon enhanced competition for medicines in the marketplace

July 27, 2017

Why reauthorization of PDUFA matters

July 13, 2017

A critical opportunity to prevent prescription drug abuse

June 2, 2017

Former law enforcement officials raise concerns with drug importation proposals

May 11, 2017

Resources for understanding the dangers of drug importation

March 28, 2017

Guest Post: The importance of a modern FDA in drug discovery

March 22, 2017

How drug importation schemes could increase U.S. law enforcement burdens

March 16, 2017

Case Study: How one online pharmacy knowingly endangered U.S. consumers

March 2, 2017

Why drug importation threatens patient safety

February 28, 2017

Fact Check Friday: The truth about drug importation and patient safety

February 24, 2017

What you don’t know about importation from Canada

February 17, 2017

Discovery of counterfeit hepatitis C drug is another example of why importation is bad for patients

February 13, 2017

Three things to know about the accelerated approval pathway

FDA

Prescription Drug Safety

Accelerated Approval

Three things to know about the accelerated approval pathway

December 12, 2022

Three things to know about the accelerated approval pathway

Stay current on policy making

Sign up for email updates and follow us on social. 

About

Our Agenda

Policy Issues

Resources

Blog

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Facebook

Facebook

X

Twitter X

LinkedIn

LinkedIn

Instagram

instagram logo

America's Medicines

PhRMA Foundation

Voters for Cures

Working for Cures

Innovation.org

Please type your email

Success!

You've been added to the list