phrma logo

PhRMA

PhRMA Sites

Login

Explore Member-Only Resources

Access exclusive advocacy, policy, and research materials through the member site.

Login now

About

About

Our Agenda

Our Agenda

Policy Issues

We believe that patients should have access to innovative medicines.

Learn More

Innovation Ecosystem

Intellectual Property

Research & Development

Future of Medicine

Government Price Setting

International

Innovation Ecosystem

Patient Access & Affordability

PBMs & Middlemen

Hospitals and 340B

Insurance Coverage

Cost of Medicines

Medicare & Medicaid

Patient Access & Affordability

Resources

Our mission is to conduct effective advocacy for public policies that encourage the discovery of important, new medicines for patients by biopharmaceutical research companies.

Learn More

Resources

Resources

Newsroom

Newsroom

Blog

Blog

America's Medicines

PhRMA Foundation

PhRMA Foundation Logo

Voters for Cures

VotersForCures.org Logo

Working for Cures

workersforcures.org logo

This is Innovation

Innovation.org logo

View More

Search in PhRMA

Find resources, news, and articles related to policy issues and scientific innovation.

What are you looking for?

Most Recent

Policy Paper

Press

Blog

Report

Fact Sheet

Event

Resource

Pages

Leader

Author

Comment

not used title

not used title

In health care, who should decide value? In many industrialized countries with single-payer health systems, the answer is “the government.” A new analysis by Avalere illustrates the negative impact this answer has on patient access to care.

After medicines have been approved for marketing (for example, by the European Medicines Agency), many countries – like the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Canada – rely on external health technology assessment (HTA) organizations to guide their decisions on the value of medicines. Avalere looked at the HTA reports in these four countries to determine how often they supported coverage of cancer medicines. Of 329 oncology assessments from 2013 to 2017, only 29 percent resulted in positive recommendations without coverage restrictions. The other 71 percent recommended restricted coverage or did not recommend coverage at all. The study also found that HTA reports are increasingly recommending utilization restrictions (such as restricting coverage to specific patient subpopulations) on such treatments.

Additional findings include:

  • Across all four countries, approximately 16 percent of oncology assessments resulted in a “not recommended” decision.
  • In the United Kingdom, only seven of nearly 100 assessments conducted by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) resulted in a “recommended” decision.
  • HTA recommendations regarding oncology treatments have grown more restrictive over the last four years. Only 16 oncology products were “recommended with restrictions” in 2014; in 2017 that number climbed to 56.

Although HTA recommendations are applied differently by payers across the different countries, they can have profound consequences for patients. We need better answers than the approaches taken in many other countries, which result in patients facing access barriers to important cancer treatments. That’s one reason our sector is putting an unprecedented level of support into the development of better, more patient-centered methods for assessing care value.

Download the full Avalere analysis here.

Randy Burkholder

Randy Burkholder is a Vice President of Policy and Research at PhRMA. He has over 17 years experience in health care policy, advocacy and communications in the medical technology and pharmaceutical industries.

New study: HPV vaccination helps prevent cervical cancer deaths

July 21, 2026

America's cancer research progress is real and worth protecting

May 28, 2026

Ahead of ASCO: Cancer innovation is promising, but policy choices matter

May 26, 2026

Advancing patient care: A look at new medicines approved in 2025

January 30, 2026

New analysis shows that HTA organizations may frequently restrict access to cancer treatments

Access

Cancer

Value-Driven Health Care

New analysis shows that HTA organizations may frequently restrict access to cancer treatments

June 1, 2018

New analysis shows that HTA organizations may frequently restrict access to cancer treatments

Stay current on policy making

Sign up for email updates and follow us on social. 

About

Our Agenda

Policy Issues

Resources

Blog

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Facebook

Facebook

X

Twitter X

LinkedIn

LinkedIn

Instagram

instagram logo

America's Medicines

PhRMA Foundation

Voters for Cures

Working for Cures

Innovation.org

Please type your email

Success!

You've been added to the list